I have to give the obvious.
The opposite angles are congruent, please look at W
angle U= angle YI have to give the obvious.
The opposite angles are congruent, please look at W
Please double check #3 and provide the reason for each statement.angle U= angle Y
angle UWV= angle YWX
UW=VW
By AAS or ASA, two triangles are congruent.
Specifically, how do I provide reasoning?Please double check #3 and provide the reason for each statement.
Have you taken a formal course in geometry?Specifically, how do I provide reasoning?
You listed the 3 statements in the last post either as a random guess (I doubt it) or there were specific reasons for each one. So, assuming you didn't just guess, please post those reasons.Specifically, how do I provide reasoning?
Yes, the triangles in the figure are congruent.You listed the 3 statements in the last post either as a random guess (I doubt it) or there were specific reasons for each one. So, assuming you didn't just guess, please post those reasons.
Double checking it would the third statement be UW = WY and isn’t the asa theorem the reasoning?angle U= angle Y -- yes
angle UWV= angle YWX -- yes, why?
UW=VW -- why???? I asked to double check this statement. Did you?
ASA theorem needs equal angle, side, angle. You need to prove that they are equal - that's the 3 statements with reasons. Then you can use the theorem to prove that the triangles are congruent.Double checking it would the third statement be UW = WY and isn’t the asa theorem the reasoning?
What does d(UW = d(WY) mean?
d(UW) = UW = length of line segment UWWhat does d(UW = d(WY) mean?
Does this work?d(UW) = UW = length of line segment UW