Can I ask you eutas1? Drawing is not required in the problem. Why do you draw?
Radians and the Unit Circle
- Thread starter eutas1
- Start date
pka
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Messages
- 11,971
Assuming that by (c) you mean part (c) as posted in reply #1: 18(c) \(\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-x\right)\) given \(x\in \left(\dfrac{\pi}{2},\pi\right)\).
In my opinion the given is totally extraneous. \(\cos(a-b)=sin(a) sin(b) + cos(a) cos(b)\)
We should know that \(\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right)=0~\&~\sin\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right)=1\).
Taken together we get simply \(\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-x\right)=\sin(x)\). SEE HERE
We have learnt to draw for simple questions, and it makes it easier to visually see what is going on.
Dr.Peterson
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 16,051
I want to know what you are being taught (and others want to know, too!). You said that what you showed in attachment T was what the teacher showed you for (c), so I want to know what was said about it. I don't care what you did earlier that was wrong; I want to understand what you were told is right.
My understanding is that you are early in the process of learning about trig functions in terms of the unit circle, which is why a visual approach is appropriate; there is a lot you haven't learned yet. I think this problem goes too far with that, but I have certainly taught such methods, using reference angles and a triangle, to explain basic ideas such as symmetries in the functions.
Dr.Peterson
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 16,051
My understanding is that, in context, the problem expects this particular approach.
In fact, the reason for the specified domain would be to tell the student what quadrant to draw the angle in; sometimes you can draw an angle in the first quadrant and assume it works in all quadrants, but in fact it doesn't. When they learn more, they will learn that these particular identities are not restricted to certain quadrants, while some others are.
Please refer to my attachment:
Attachments
Dr.Peterson
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 16,051
The trouble is, this "x" is not in the right domain; I can only guess that it is not really meant to be the x of the problem. It appears to be the reference angle all the way through.
Oh yeah... does that mean it is wrong?
And why is x not in the right domain? Isn't the domain (pi/2, pi)?
Dr.Peterson
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 16,051
Isn't it clear that the angle marked as x is acute?? The angle that is in the right domain is the unmarked angle from the positive x axis to the final yellow line. (A line is not an angle.)
My sense is that your teacher is not writing what they mean. What they mean, and perhaps even what they say to you in explaining it, may be right, but a math teacher really should teach how to write what you mean. The picture does not communicate truth.
Ahhhhhhhhh I am not sure what to do............
This problem is EASY if you use basic identities. Why are you even discussing reference angles?
[MATH]sin( \theta ) = cos \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \theta \right ).[/MATH]
Why is that relevant? Because
[MATH]sin \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = cos \left \{ \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) \right \} = cos(x - \pi).[/MATH]
[MATH]cos(\phi + k \pi) = - cos(\phi) \text { for any integer } k.[/MATH]
[MATH]- 1 \text { is an integer.}[/MATH]
[MATH]\therefore sin \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = - cos (x).[/MATH]
Do the signs make sense? Now we can use the unit circle to check for reasonableness. Is it not obvious that if x is in the first quadrant the cosine is non-negative and that therefore the additive inverse of that cosine is non-positive. Moreover
[MATH]0 \le x \le \dfrac{\pi}{2}\implies - \dfrac{\pi}{2} \le - x \le 0 \implies \pi \le \dfrac{3 \pi }{2} - x \le \dfrac{3 \pi}{2}.[/MATH]
Thus we are in the third quadrant, and the sine is non-positive.
[MATH]sin( \theta ) = cos \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \theta \right ).[/MATH]
Why is that relevant? Because
[MATH]sin \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = cos \left \{ \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) \right \} = cos(x - \pi).[/MATH]
[MATH]cos(\phi + k \pi) = - cos(\phi) \text { for any integer } k.[/MATH]
[MATH]- 1 \text { is an integer.}[/MATH]
[MATH]\therefore sin \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = - cos (x).[/MATH]
Do the signs make sense? Now we can use the unit circle to check for reasonableness. Is it not obvious that if x is in the first quadrant the cosine is non-negative and that therefore the additive inverse of that cosine is non-positive. Moreover
[MATH]0 \le x \le \dfrac{\pi}{2}\implies - \dfrac{\pi}{2} \le - x \le 0 \implies \pi \le \dfrac{3 \pi }{2} - x \le \dfrac{3 \pi}{2}.[/MATH]
Thus we are in the third quadrant, and the sine is non-positive.
By the way, radians are not relevant to this logic.
[MATH]0 \le x \le 90 \implies - 90 \le - x \le 0 \implies 180 \le 270 - x \le 270.[/MATH]
So the sine is non-positive.
[MATH]sin (\theta ) = cos(90 - \theta)[/MATH]
[MATH]\therefore sin (270 - x) = cos\{90 - (270 - x)\} = cos(x - 180) = - cos(x).[/MATH]
The reason to learn radians is not to get different results in trig, but to make calculus less messy.
[MATH]0 \le x \le 90 \implies - 90 \le - x \le 0 \implies 180 \le 270 - x \le 270.[/MATH]
So the sine is non-positive.
[MATH]sin (\theta ) = cos(90 - \theta)[/MATH]
[MATH]\therefore sin (270 - x) = cos\{90 - (270 - x)\} = cos(x - 180) = - cos(x).[/MATH]
The reason to learn radians is not to get different results in trig, but to make calculus less messy.
I don't get the part after 'Because' ....
Do you agree that
[MATH]sin ( \theta ) = \cos \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \theta \right ).[/MATH]
[MATH]\text {Let } \theta = \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \implies[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{\pi}{2} - \theta = \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = \dfrac{\pi(1 - 3)}{2} + x = x - \pi.[/MATH]
Basic algebra.
[MATH]\therefore sin \left ( \dfrac{3 \pi}{2} - x \right ) = cos(x - \pi).[/MATH]
What is there not to understand?
Ohh, I see now.
So with
sin(θ) = cos(π/2 − θ) , theta can be angle? It does not have to be acute?
[MATH]cos \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} - \theta \right ) = cos \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} \right )cos ( \theta ) + sin \left ( \dfrac{\pi}{2} \right ) sin ( \theta) = 0 * cos (\theta) + 1 * sin(\theta ) = sin (\theta).[/MATH]
Do you see anything in that referring to acute angles?
Do you see anything in that referring to acute angles?