I used to think that integration always represented the area under a curve. Recently, I encountered some problems involving area calculations, and only after a few attempts did I realize that parts of the graph were below the x-axis, causing the positive and negative areas to cancel each other out.
Since I am not very experienced at visualizing the graph of f(x), whenever I am asked to find the area under a curve, my instinct is to simply compute the integration.
That is how I approached these problems every time, assuming that the integration would directly give the area. Area = [math]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)[/math]
I solved this yesterday
[math]\int_{0}^{3} x(x-2)(x+2) dx = 2.25[/math]
The area happened to be 10.25 squared inches. I do not understand when and when not to include the negative area?
Since I am not very experienced at visualizing the graph of f(x), whenever I am asked to find the area under a curve, my instinct is to simply compute the integration.
That is how I approached these problems every time, assuming that the integration would directly give the area. Area = [math]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)[/math]
I solved this yesterday
[math]\int_{0}^{3} x(x-2)(x+2) dx = 2.25[/math]
The area happened to be 10.25 squared inches. I do not understand when and when not to include the negative area?