I am not sure I understand..If you swap 'x' and 'y' the angle won't change, but the derivatives will be easier to compute.
Can I just swap x and y like that???If you swap 'x' and 'y' the angle won't change, but the derivatives will be easier to compute.
Why?You might want to watch the sign of the angle though.
Maybe not. Nothing in the problem statement says that you need to compute a signed angle. Sometime the angle between two vectors is assigned positive values for counterclockwise direction from the first to the second and negative values for clockwise directions. This does not seem to be the case here, so please disregard my post.Why?
I meant, does switching x and y influence the sign?Maybe not. Nothing in the problem statement says that you need to compute a signed angle. Sometime the angle between two vectors is assigned positive values for counterclockwise direction from the first to the second and negative values for clockwise directions. This does not seem to be the case here, so please disregard my post.
Yes, reflections flip the sign of an angle. But I don't think the problem statement requires consideration of signs.I meant, does switching x and y influence the sign?
i am not sure i understand where this even came fromYou'll have to consider 2 cases:
1) Notice that for [imath]a=-b[/imath]. Both curves are exactly the same. This is trivial.
2) For [imath]a\neq -b[/imath], the intersecting points are:
[math]4a^2-4ax=4b^2+4bx\\ (4a^2-4b^2)=(4a+4b)x\\ \frac{(2a-2b)\cancel{(2a+b)}}{2\cancel{(2a+2b)}}=x\\ x=a-b\\ \implies y^2=4a(a-x)=4a(a-(a-b))=4ab\implies y= \pm 2\sqrt{ab}\\ \therefore\text{the intersecting points are } \{a-b,\,\pm 2\sqrt{ab}\}[/math]
If you’re referring to the first line of case 2, maybe look at the question itself. It should look very familiar to you.?i am not sure i understand where this even came from
dy/dx = tan(t) then dx/dy = cot(t) = tan(pi/2 - t)If you swap 'x' and 'y' the angle won't change, but the derivatives will be easier to compute.
View attachment 32379
First, you're dividing by 0 here. How do you get 90? Something isn't right.
Second, you have two points of intercepts, therefore you should have 2 angles.
I never get two angles using the formula, only one.Isn't tan 90 degrees 1/0?
Yes, you're right. I was following your work and did not see tan(x) anywhere. I did it with implicit differentiation, the derivative is a bit cleaner IMO.Isn't tan 90 degrees 1/0?
How did you get the second line?y12=4a(a−x)2y⋅y1′=−4a