Bath filling problem

cohen27

New member
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Messages
2
Dear Colleagues,
I have been reading David Acheson - 'The Spirit of Mathematics'.
How long would it take for C to fill the bath alone?.
I understand the reasoning of the three equations he sets out, but stuck on the process circled in red in the problem attached.
My question is: How did he get rid of A in the second equation ( a+c=1/5)?. I understand where he rewrote the equation to get a by itself (a=1/5-c),
but I don't understand how he got from a=1/5-c to 1/5-c+2c=1/4 ?.
The question is attached.
Thank you.
MATHEMATICS FIRST bath filling problem.jpg
 
[math]\begin{array}{lll} a+b&=\dfrac{1}{4}\\[8pt] a+c&=\dfrac{1}{5}\\[8pt] b&=2c \end{array}[/math]
The first step was to plug in [imath] b [/imath] from (3) into (1), i.e., [imath] a+2c=1/4, [/imath] call it (4). Then we rewrite (2) as [imath] a=1/5 - c, [/imath] call it (5). Finally, we take the first equation and plug in [imath] b [/imath] from equation (3) and [imath] a [/imath] from equation (5), i.e., [math] \dfrac{1}{4}=a+b= \left(\dfrac{1}{5}-c\right)+2c.[/math]
Note that such a way to solve a linear equation system is a bit arbitrary, depending on which equations you choose to do what. There is a risk of ending up with an expression like [imath] 1=1 [/imath] at some point of the calculation. My suggestion would be to use (1) and (2) for eliminating [imath] a [/imath] and this result together with (3) for eliminating [imath] b. [/imath] This would be more systematic. If you want to look up how it is done in general, then we need more notations such as matrices and vectors. Your search key should be "Gaussian Elimination".
 
Dear Fresh_42, I'll try and make sense of it.
Can I ask the best way to begin learning and manipulating linear equations for a complete beginner?.
I thought David Acheson's book would be a gentle 'conceptual' book on algebra - but it's not conceptual.
 
Last edited:
Dear Fresh_42, I'll try and make sense of it.
Can I ask the best way to begin learning and manipulating linear equations for a complete beginner?.
I thought David Acheson's book would be a gentle 'conceptual' book on algebra - but it's not conceptual.

I was taught this subject as three methods of solving linear equations: substitution, addition, and one I have forgotten the name of and how. There was much wind about nothing. So instead of creating confusion, I would teach it as follows:

Step one: Bring all variables (unknowns) on one side and add and multiply out whatever can be added and multiplied, and the constant term on the other.

Example: [imath] 2(x+3y)-y= 5y- 3(x-y) +15 [/imath] becomes
[math]\begin{array}{lll} 2x+6y-y&=5y-3x+3y+15\\ 2x+5y&=8y-3x+15\\ 5x-3y&=15 \end{array}[/math]
Step two: Choose a variable to separate and express its value in terms of the remaining variables.

Example: [imath] 5x-3y=15 [/imath] becomes [imath] x=\dfrac{1}{5}\left(15+3y \right)=3+\dfrac{3}{5}y [/imath]

Step three: Proceed with this method for the next variable (unknown) where you substitute [imath] x [/imath] by [imath] 3+\dfrac{3}{5}y [/imath] whenever it occurs. This way, you eliminated [imath] x [/imath] and have an equation less (the first) and a variable (unknown) less (the [imath] x [/imath]).

The given problem has already done step one, except that the third equation by my method reads [imath] b-2c=0. [/imath] Step two gives us [imath] a=\dfrac{1}{4}-b [/imath] from the first equation. Step three then is the following system:

[math]\begin{array}{lll} \left(a=\dfrac{1}{4}-b\right)&\\[8pt] a+c&=\dfrac{1}{4}-b+c=\dfrac{1}{5}\\[8pt] b-2c&=0 \end{array}[/math]
These are now two equations with two unknowns, [imath] b [/imath] and [imath] c. [/imath] Now, we start again with step one

[math]\begin{array}{lll} \dfrac{1}{4}-b+c&=\dfrac{1}{5} \Longrightarrow -b+c=\dfrac{1}{5}-\dfrac{1}{4}=-\dfrac{1}{20}\\[8pt] b-2c&=0 \end{array}[/math]
Step two gives us [imath] b=c+\dfrac{1}{20} [/imath] and step three, plugging it into the last equation, yields

[math]\begin{array}{lll} b-2c=c+\dfrac{1}{20}-2c=-c+\dfrac{1}{20}=0 \Longrightarrow c=\dfrac{1}{20} \end{array}[/math]
For the other variables, go backward to the previous equations with your knowledge of [imath] c. [/imath] We then have

[math]\begin{array}{lll} b=2c=\dfrac{2}{20}=\dfrac{1}{10}\\[8pt] a=\dfrac{1}{4}-b=\dfrac{1}{4}-\dfrac{1}{10}=\dfrac{5}{20}-\dfrac{2}{20}=\dfrac{3}{20} \end{array}[/math]
This is not the most elegant way, or the shortest, but it works. E.g., we could reorder the variables and start with [imath] b=2c [/imath] and substitute [imath] b [/imath] everywhere so we will be left with equations in [imath] a [/imath] and [imath] c. [/imath]

There is a shortcut for two equations and two variables, but I don't want to confuse you. It's a kind of magical trick.
 
You need to have a better understanding of what "=" means. If x = y, then anywhere you see x you can replace it with y and anywhere you see y you can replace it with x.
You have right above your red circle that a+2c=1/4 and you know that a=1/5-c. So wherever you see a you can write 1/5-c. Well you see a in a+2c=1/4, so a+2c=1/4 can be written as 1/5-c +2c=1/4
 
Top