Calculate Distance of Curved Side

devitius

New member
Joined
May 15, 2010
Messages
10
Don't know where to start on this one... looks like it should be easy!?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 1,062
\(\displaystyle Sector \ of \ a \ Circle:\)

\(\displaystyle AB \ = \ r\theta, \ r \ = \ 50cm., \ what \ does \ \theta \ equal?\)
 
Ok, the angle must be 90 degrees because it is a quarter circle. So, from my calculations, the answer would be:

AB = r? = (50cm) x (?/2) = 50cm x 1.57 = 78.54

So the answer would be D - closest to 80cm.

I should have figured by simply dividing the equation of the circumference of a circle by 4. So:

Circumference of a circle = 2?r / 4 = ?r / 2

This particular question was actually directed towards year 9 students in a generic test on numeracy. This makes me wonder if such students would be expected to derive this equation, or whether or not there is some other "rough" way of going about this to find an estimation (esp. considering the answers themselves are estimates).
 
I doubt if the students at this level are expected to derive \(\displaystyle s=r{\theta}\).

Just know how to use it correctly.

It can be derived through calculus.

Or use proportions;

\(\displaystyle \frac{s}{2{\pi}r} \;\ \frac{\text{length of arc}}{\text{circle circumference}}=\frac{\theta}{2{\pi}} \;\ \frac{\text{central angle of sector}}{\text{central angle of circle}}\)

Now, solving for s gives the formula.
 
Just as they wouldn't be expected to derive the circumference of a quarter circle from the equation of a full circumference, they certainly wouldn't be expected to derive it though calculus :D

Any ideas for a "rough" method for estimating this answer?
 
Exactly. No one is expected to derive \(\displaystyle s=r{\theta}\). Just use it.

The arc length of the quarter circle can be found by

\(\displaystyle s=50(\frac{\pi}{2})=25{\pi}=78.54\)

It is closest to 80 cm.

Which is what you have.
 
Sorry, I didn't mean "derive" is in have the yr9 students come up with the equation from basic principles, rather to recognize that they require the need of that specific equation.

Basically what I'm saying is that this test, including this question, was likely to have been designed so that the students could problem-solve the questions rather than requiring the need to recall specific equations.

So I'm wondering if there is another "rough" method of estimating the answer which doesn't require knowing this equation?

Or would you expect that every junior high school student should know the equation for the cirumference of a circle from heart and realize they could modify it to apply it to a quarter circle. Otherwise, the question would discrimate on some part (and be poorly designed).
 
Learn the formula would be my advice. It is not a very large and complicated one.

Just make sure to tell the students that theta is in radians.

Or, use degrees and then convert.

For instance, with this problem, using degrees:

\(\displaystyle 50(90)=4500\)

\(\displaystyle 4500(\frac{\pi}{180})=25{\pi}\) as before.
 
\(\displaystyle If \ the \ student \ knows \ that \ C \ = \ 2\pi r \ (which \ he/she \ should), \ then \ it \ is \ a \ short \ hop\)

\(\displaystyle to: \ AB \ = \ \frac{C}{4} \ = \ \frac{2\pi r}{4} \ = \ \frac{\pi r }{2} \ = \ \frac{50\pi}{2} \ = \ 25\pi.\)
 
Top