Calculation of conditional probability (hail)

jones123

New member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
6
Hi,

If there is a 50% chance of thunderstorms and a 25% chance that if a thunderstorm occurs, it will bring hail, then what is the chance of hail?

Thanks!
 
one has to assume some probability for hail if there is no thunderstorm. Once done you can apply\displaystyle \text{one has to assume some probability for hail if there is no thunderstorm. Once done you can apply}

P(H)=P(HT)P(T)+P(H!T)P(!T)where T is the event a thunderstorm occurs and H is the event hail occurs\displaystyle P(H) = P(H|T) P(T) + P(H|!T)P(!T) \\ \text{where $T$ is the event a thunderstorm occurs and $H$ is the event hail occurs}
 
one has to assume some probability for hail if there is no thunderstorm. Once done you can apply\displaystyle \text{one has to assume some probability for hail if there is no thunderstorm. Once done you can apply}

P(H)=P(HT)P(T)+P(H!T)P(!T)where T is the event a thunderstorm occurs and H is the event hail occurs\displaystyle P(H) = P(H|T) P(T) + P(H|!T)P(!T) \\ \text{where $T$ is the event a thunderstorm occurs and $H$ is the event hail occurs}
Obiously, the chance of hail is zero if no thunderstorm occurs. This reduces the equation to:
P(H) = P(H|T) P(T) + P(H|!T)P(!T) = 0.25*0.5 = 0.125

Is that correct?

Thanks!
 
Well, it is not obvious that hail is caused exclusively by thunderstorms. I had to look up "hail" at wikipedia to confirm that particular meteorological fact. Perhaps you should have posed your question at a help site for meteorologists.

However, given that fact, the second summand in romsek's formula reduces to zero because

[MATH]\text {P(H given not T) * P(not T)} = 0 \text { * P(not T)} = 0.[/MATH]
So you are correct.
 
Top