Mathmasteriw
Junior Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
- Messages
- 85
Hi Mathmasteriw. That's an interesting form of function notation that I've never seen before. I'm curious. Where did you see it?dtdv(5) …
Good point, Jomo, but we don't know for sure what the given instructions may have said.… -0.164 is an approximation and not the exact answer.
Thanks, Halls. It prompted me to think of and ponder this:I have seen that [derivative notation] in many places …
Agree!… Some people would prefer [dtdv(5)] to [dtdv(5)] …
I owe a lot to what I have learned to this page ??Hi Mathmasteriw. That's an interesting form of function notation that I've never seen before. I'm curious. Where did you see it?
?
If memory serves me I've seen this in many forms in Math texts but the above quote is the only way I've seen Physicists write it.dtdv∣t=5