Finding angles of the trapezoid

RealSidi

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2021
Messages
5
Hi, can anyone please help finding the values on the angles of the trapezoid in the image attached. AD and BC are equal. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
(Sorry if my English is bad)20211104_173052.jpg
 
Hi, can anyone please help finding the values on the angles of the trapezoid in the image attached. AD and BC are equal. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
(Sorry if my English is bad)View attachment 29550
What do we know about angles in an isosceles trapezoid? If you are not sure, what about base angles in an isosceles triangle?
Does the problem say anything about DE? If nothing, then 40 degree angles is useless.
If DE is parallel to BC or same length as AD or BC, consider triangle ADE. Can you find the base angles?
 
What do we know about angles in an isosceles trapezoid? If you are not sure, what about base angles in an isosceles triangle?
Does the problem say anything about DE? If nothing, then 40 degree angles is useless.
If DE is parallel to BC or same length as AD or BC, consider triangle ADE. Can you find the base angles?
What do we know about angles in an isosceles trapezoid?
That opposite angles are equal. Same for the 2 lower angles if the triangle is isosceles, however I don't think we can prove that.

Yes I know how to solve the problem if the triangle is isosceles, but we would need to prove that first.

If you can help me prove that or have any other suggestions, that would be great.

Thanks in advance.
 
What do we know about angles in an isosceles trapezoid?
That opposite angles are equal. Same for the 2 lower angles if the triangle is isosceles, however I don't think we can prove that.

Yes I know how to solve the problem if the triangle is isosceles, but we would need to prove that first.

If you can help me prove that or have any other suggestions, that would be great.

Thanks in advance.
The definition of isosceles trapezoid is:

In Euclidean geometry, an isosceles trapezoid is a convex quadrilateral with a line of symmetry bisecting one pair of opposite sides.

That definition tells you that due to symmetry, the base angles must be equal and the other two angles must be equal,

Read the response #2 over again and please answer all the questions posed.
 
What do we know about angles in an isosceles trapezoid?
That opposite angles are equal. Same for the 2 lower angles if the triangle is isosceles, however I don't think we can prove that.

Yes I know how to solve the problem if the triangle is isosceles, but we would need to prove that first.

If you can help me prove that or have any other suggestions, that would be great.

Thanks in advance.
Please post an image that includes the diagram AND the question.
 
The definition of isosceles trapezoid is:

In Euclidean geometry, an isosceles trapezoid is a convex quadrilateral with a line of symmetry bisecting one pair of opposite sides.

That definition tells you that due to symmetry, the base angles must be equal and the other two angles must be equal
Yes sorry, that's what I meant to say. Is there a way that this information helps us in solving the problem?
 
Please post an image that includes the diagram AND the question.
Please find attached the following two images. The question isn't in English so the 2nd imagine shows it translated in English.
 

Attachments

  • 20211108_161204.jpg
    20211108_161204.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 7
  • 20211108_161102.jpg
    20211108_161102.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 6
Please find attached the following two images. The question isn't in English so the 2nd imagine shows it translated in English.
Ok, looks like a bad problem statement. I think you need to assume that DE is congruent to AD and BC.
Given this assumption, please draw a diagram showing all sets of equal angles.
 
Ok, looks like a bad problem statement. I think you need to assume that DE is congruent to AD and BC.
Given this assumption, please draw a diagram showing all sets of equal angles.
If that's the case, then it's easy, however my teacher told me that we cannot assume that, so is there a way to solve it without assuming?
 

Attachments

  • 20211108_175707.jpg
    20211108_175707.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 4
If that's the case, then it's easy, however my teacher told me that we cannot assume that, so is there a way to solve it without assuming?
Ask your teacher why DE looks parallel to BC. If there are no constraints on DE then the diagram should look like the one in the attached image. Meaning the location of point E should be arbitrary, it should not be by some magic reason in the exact location that makes DE look parallel to BC. This is misleading.
 

Attachments

  • 20211108_123049.jpg
    20211108_123049.jpg
    584.8 KB · Views: 1
If that's the case, then it's easy, however my teacher told me that we cannot assume that, so is there a way to solve it without assuming?
You can't assume anything from what it looks like in a picture; but in this case, unless you are told something beyond what is shown, the problem can't be solved.

Show your teacher these two examples, in which everything fits what you are told, but the angles are not the same:

1636407187889.png

1636407416557.png

If we do assume that DE is parallel to CB, then we can determine a unique solution. That is why we know the problem as shown is wrong.

1636407577002.png
 
Top