You haven't finished this, @nanase, so we can only tell you that what you have done so far is correct. ("there will be 26 zeros." is not the correct final answer.)Hello I am working on this question, can you please tell me if what I have done is correct? there will be 26 zeros.
I have no answer key for this question
View attachment 37939
I think you're correct, though I would have written the details differently (focusing on prime factors). You've shown that the number is equal to 10^26 times a number with no factors of 10 (because it has no factors of 2).Hello I am working on this question, can you please tell me if what I have done is correct? there will be 26 zeros.
I have no answer key for this question
View attachment 37939
I guess I need to directly challenge you. WHY can't you conclude there are 26 trailing zeros? And HOW does introducing decimals help? I wonder if you are thinking about a different question.("there will be 26 zeros." is not the correct final answer.)
The last (complete) line you did could be simplified to: 1015 × 517 × 1026 but you can't just then say that will have 26 trailing zeroes!
Indeed and that's a much quicker and much more elegant method than what I suggested!I think you're correct, though I would have written the details differently (focusing on prime factors). You've shown that the number is equal to 10^26 times a number with no factors of 10 (because it has no factors of 2).
No, I wasn't thinking about a different question, I just wasn't thinking very well at all! (I'm tired.I guess I need to directly challenge you. WHY can't you conclude there are 26 trailing zeros? And HOW does introducing decimals help? I wonder if you are thinking about a different question.