I am trying to solve this implicit equation

ccdean100

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4
Apologies, there were some mistakes in that equation. Here is the correct one:


(A*((D*ECARB)+(E*log((F+(G*ECARB))/H)))) = 1

Again, for ECARB

Can anyone help with this?

Charles
 
ccdean100 said:
Apologies, there were some mistakes in that equation. Here is the correct one:


(A*((D*ECARB)+(E*log((F+(G*ECARB))/H)))) = 1

Again, for ECARB

Can anyone help with this?

Charles

substitute

ECARB = x

(A*((D*ECARB)+(E*log((F+(G*ECARB))/H)))) = 1

A*[D*x+E*log{(F+G*x)/H}] = 1

D*x + E*log{(F+G*x)/H} = 1/A

This is a non-linear equation - do you know Newton_Raphson method?
 


I'm not sure what an "implicit equation" is.

I put your equation into Maple (assuming that the logarithm is base-10), and it reported a solution in terms of the LambertW function.

[attachment=0:th0sgxl5]lambertw.JPG[/attachment:th0sgxl5]

 

Attachments

  • lambertw.JPG
    lambertw.JPG
    30.8 KB · Views: 31
Hi, I've heard of it but never used it. Is there are straightforward way of using the method for this example?
 
ccdean100 said:
Hi, I've heard of it but never used it. Is there are straightforward way of using the method for this example?

Yes - if you know the numerical values of those constants (A, G, etc.)
 
Yes, all of the constants are known... any tips on how to use the Netwon method in this example?
 
Re:

mmm4444bot said:


I'm not sure what an "implicit equation" is.

I put your equation into Maple (assuming that the logarithm is base-10), and it reported a solution in terms of the LambertW function.

[attachment=0:1a2bzivd]lambertw.JPG[/attachment:1a2bzivd]


Thankyou, but in the equation you show, at the end, there is "ln(10)" ("EG+FDln(10)") but there is nothing inside of the log term, so what does that mean in Maple speak?! - it appears to be natural log of something, but of what?

Many thanks.
 
ccdean100 said:
Yes, all of the constants are known... any tips on how to use the Netwon method in this example?

Use Google - read up on the topic - tell us what you found and how do you propose to use the method.
 


My version of Maple likes natural logarithms; it usually converts base-10 to base-e (without asking) using the change-of-base formula:

\(\displaystyle \log_{10}(x) \;=\; \frac{ln(x)}{ln(10)}\)

 
Top