F Fisiodes New member Joined Oct 21, 2021 Messages 6 Oct 24, 2021 #1 If logarithms can't have negative argument, why log_2 (-X) graph is the reflection of log_2 (x) across y axis?
If logarithms can't have negative argument, why log_2 (-X) graph is the reflection of log_2 (x) across y axis?
F Fisiodes New member Joined Oct 21, 2021 Messages 6 Oct 24, 2021 #2 Ok, understood, bc only for negative values x became positive
Dr.Peterson Elite Member Joined Nov 12, 2017 Messages 16,871 Oct 24, 2021 #3 Fisiodes said: If logarithms can't have negative argument, why log_2 (-X) graph is the reflection of log_2 (x) across y axis? Click to expand... Try plotting points and see! If [imath]f(x) = log_2(-x)[/imath], what is [imath]f(-2)[/imath]? You'll observe that the logarithm itself does not have a negative argument there!
Fisiodes said: If logarithms can't have negative argument, why log_2 (-X) graph is the reflection of log_2 (x) across y axis? Click to expand... Try plotting points and see! If [imath]f(x) = log_2(-x)[/imath], what is [imath]f(-2)[/imath]? You'll observe that the logarithm itself does not have a negative argument there!