Here is another way to look at it. Does this logic sound reasonable? Some books don't talk about taking the 2nd root (square root):
\(\displaystyle 16x^{4} - 9y^{4}\)
\(\displaystyle (\sqrt[2]{16})(\sqrt[2]{x^{4}}) - (\sqrt[2]{9})(\sqrt[2]{y^{4}})\) Taking the 2nd root of the number and variable (respectively) in each term. Easily done with a calculator.
\(\displaystyle (4)(x^{4/2}) - (3)(y^{4/2})\) - This step could be left out if you could quickly recognize the fractional exponent \(\displaystyle 4/2\), and note that it reduces to 2.
\(\displaystyle 4x^{2} - 3y^{2}\)
\(\displaystyle [4x^{2}]^{2} - [3y^{2]^{2}}\) - Stick on a 2nd power on each term.
\(\displaystyle (4x^{2} - 3y^{2})(4x^{2} + 3y^{2})\) - Factor out
\(\displaystyle 16x^{4} - 9y^{4}\)
\(\displaystyle (\sqrt[2]{16})(\sqrt[2]{x^{4}}) - (\sqrt[2]{9})(\sqrt[2]{y^{4}})\) Taking the 2nd root of the number and variable (respectively) in each term. Easily done with a calculator.
\(\displaystyle (4)(x^{4/2}) - (3)(y^{4/2})\) - This step could be left out if you could quickly recognize the fractional exponent \(\displaystyle 4/2\), and note that it reduces to 2.
\(\displaystyle 4x^{2} - 3y^{2}\)
\(\displaystyle [4x^{2}]^{2} - [3y^{2]^{2}}\) - Stick on a 2nd power on each term.
\(\displaystyle (4x^{2} - 3y^{2})(4x^{2} + 3y^{2})\) - Factor out
Last edited: