[MOVED] Logarithm Q: why does log(16)/log(2) = ln(16)/ln(2)?

lktu

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
1
Why can you use both log and ln when finding a missing exponent. For example log 16/log 2 = 4 and ln 16 / ln 2 = 4.

Why do these two give the same result even though they are different functions and different bases?

Thanks
 
These follow from the change-of-base formula:

. . . . .4 = log<sub>2</sub>(16)

. . . . . . .= log<sub>10</sub>(16) / log<sub>10</sub>(2)

. . . . . . .= ln(16) / ln(2)

Try proving the change-of-base formula, to explain this to yourself.

. . . . .Change of base: For any bases "b" and "c", the
. . . . .following relation holds:

. . . . . . .log<sub>b</sub>(x) = log<sub>c</sub>(x) / log<sub>c</sub>(b)

If you can prove this, you'll have your proof of why your log relations hold.

Eliz.
 
Top