- Thread starter Ryan$
- Start date

I have no clue what you are talking about. You need to give a problem completely and exactly or, even better, give the definition of "superposition" used in your book.Hi guys, I'm not getting the idea the superposition method in math, I mean if I have X then by superposition I can do X=x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8.....+xn

but why?! thanks. I'm not understanding the concept of superposition ..

What course did this come up in?

Are you by any chance talking about

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle X = \sum_{j=1}^n x_j.\)

Last edited:

What does quantity mean in math? why I'm asking about this because while I solving problems I always find obstacles about connections between quantities .. in other words for instance to find the value of something I may do sum of superposition on other things to find that value ! and doing that sum needs to understand what does quantity is !

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 3,526

Quantity is how many you have. For example: I have 3-$5bills, I have 7 bananas, I owe you 3 oranges, I have 9x's etc...How should I imagine the quantity? I visualize it as something continues that's why I guess I found it a lil complex.

May anyone please instruct me how should I visualize/analog the quantity of something in math?

Alright I'm with you, but once I start solving any problem in math specifically when there's something that equals a collections of other things then I start imagine that their "amounts" are related to each other and they are not separated (i.e words imagining the amounts as continues things) !Quantity is how many you have. For example: I have 3-$5bills, I have 7 bananas, I owe you 3 oranges, I have 9x's etc...

I will try to be more dramatically concrete about quantity term.

thanks you anyway mate!!

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 3,526

You put amounts in quotation marks but are defining quantity. But that is OK.Alright I'm with you, but once I start solving any problem in math specifically when there's something that equals a collections of other things then I start imagine that their "amounts" are related to each other and they are not separated (i.e words imagining the amounts as continues things) !

I will try to be more dramatically concrete about quantity term.

thanks you anyway mate!!

I guess you are thinking about something like x = $17.50y + $33z, where x is your total salary, y is the number of hours you worked at $17.50/hr and z is similarly defined. Yes, x is an amount! Its units are dollars. x IS relates to y and z. It is possible that y and z are separated but they are related to x. If you earn $17.50/hr and your mate earns $33/hr and your hours at work never cause any problems, then y and z are not related.

VERY meaningful!! helped me alot thanks!!!You put amounts in quotation marks but are defining quantity. But that is OK.

something that equals a collections of other things then I start imagine that their "amounts" are related to each other and they are not separated.I am not exactly sure what

theirmeans but I will try to address your concerns. I think bytheiryou really mean to use a singular proverb not plural.

I guess you are thinking about something like x = $17.50y + $33z, where x is your total salary, y is the number of hours you worked at $17.50/hr and z is similarly defined. Yes, x is an amount! Its units are dollars. x IS relates to y and z. It is possible that y and z are separated but they are related to x. If you earn $17.50/hr and your mate earns $33/hr and your hours at work never cause any problems, then y and z are not related.

another thing in the same concept, lets assume a pressure of something is defined as quantity ; so sometimes in order to find a pressure of specific thing we should do superposition of other things ! and this trick doesn't ring in my mind always ... so I guess it doesn't ring always because I miss the concept of the term "superposition". ( I mean with superposition like this X=x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6 )

if you clear up the term superposition by analogous to be remembered in my mind and thank you in advance.

- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007

- Messages
- 18,245

Can you please provide an example of this phenomenon?VERY meaningful!! helped me alot thanks!!!

another thing in the same concept, lets assume a pressure of something is defined as quantity ; so sometimes

in order to find a pressure of specific thing we should do superposition of other things !

and this trick doesn't ring in my mind always ... so I guess it doesn't ring always because I miss the concept of the term "superposition". ( I mean with superposition like this X=x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6 )

if you clear up the term superposition by analogous to be remembered in my mind and thank you in advance.

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 3,526

Please note that this is at least the 2nd time we asked this student to define/give an example of superposition.Can you please provide an example of this phenomenon?

Yes sorry for not clearing it out.Can you please provide an example of this phenomenon?

lets assume I have 7 potatoes which each of them weight 1kl , then if x is the total weight and xi the the weight of one potato ,

so the total weight = sum of all xi that I've i.e X=x1+x2+x3+...+x7 (that's called superposition)

I didn't notice before.Please note that this is at least the 2nd time we asked this student to define/give an example of superposition.

thanks

- Joined
- Apr 12, 2005

- Messages
- 9,926

Why not ponder multiplication? one orange * one orange = ?? Is THAT still "generally orange"? Does it even exist?

Are you talking about linear systems?

Are you talking about quantum systems in multiple, simultaneous states?

Are you talking about photo-superposition in photography?

Are you talking about a new layer of substrate in a geological structure?

Why would you EXPECT to be able to "visualize the superposition of things among things"? That is FAR to vague for any such expectation.

Distinct objects may be related. Does it have ANYTHING to do with "superposition"? Is that the same thing as simply grouping?

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 1,385

X+Y is an Integer because the set of Integers is closed under addition.to be more direct … X is integer and Y is integer …

… [consider] X+Y is integer …

… so my question how it's integer? …

- Joined
- Apr 12, 2005

- Messages
- 9,926

Integer + Integer ==> Integer -- Closed

Integer / Integer ==> Might be an Integer, Might be a Rational Number, might not exist. -- Not Closed

Orange + Orange ==> Orange -- They don't magically turn into Soursops. -- Closed

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 1,385

A set is "closed under addition" if adding any elements in the set results in another element in the set.what do you mean by "is closed under addition" ?!

If you add Integers together, you are guaranteed to get another Integer.

We can have closure with other operations, too. The set of Integers is closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication and exponentiation.

Another example: The set of

1 - 2 = -1

Subtraction with two elements of the set yielded an element that is not in the set.