CASE 1:KELLLY same as KEL1L2L3Y All l's are same; all the arangemnts of one particular form (KELLLY)
1:KEL1L2L3Y(Original set) 2:KEL2L1L3Y 3:KEL2L3L1Y 4:KEL1L3L2Y 5:KEL3L2L1Y 6:KEL3L1L2Y -->IF we change the position of L we will get 5 duplicates for each 1 distinct arrangement.
Total arrangements of KELLLY with repetions=npr=6factorial
6 factrial consists of each unique arrangements upto total n unqiue sets{x1,x2...Xn}+5 duplicates of every each unique arrangements 5{x1,x2...Xn}={x1,x2...Xn}+5{x1,x2...Xn}
=>{x1,x2...Xn}+5{x1,x2...Xn}=6 factorial
=>6{x1,x2...Xn}=6 factorial
=>x1...Xn=6 factorail/6 =120 arrangements
n=120 n denotes total no of disitnct permutations
Is my method of explaining this thing to myself is right?
CASE 2:If i try the same method with this word
REERR = R1E1E2R2R3
1:R2E1E2R1R3 2:R2E1E2R3R1 3:R3E1E2R1R2 4:R3E1E2R2R1 5:R1E1E2R3R2
only changing r position will give me extra 5.
Now changing E postion will give me one extra R1E2E1R2R3 of the (form REERR)
Total duplicates or extra =6 for each unqiue arrangement of the word REERR
FOR arrangmnt of REERR there are 6 extra .... and of EERRR 6 extra and so on...
Total arrangements of REERR with repetions=npr=5factorial
5 factrial consists of each unique arrangements {x1,x2...Xn}+6 duplicates of every each unique arrangements 6{x1,x2...Xn}={x1,x2...Xn}+6{x1,x2...Xn}
=>{x1,x2...Xn}+6{x1,x2...Xn}=5 factorial
=>7{x1,x2...Xn}=5 factorial
=>x1...Xn=5 factorail/7
WHy wrong? Why the previous method does not work in case2
@Dr.Peterson @Subhotosh Khan
1:KEL1L2L3Y(Original set) 2:KEL2L1L3Y 3:KEL2L3L1Y 4:KEL1L3L2Y 5:KEL3L2L1Y 6:KEL3L1L2Y -->IF we change the position of L we will get 5 duplicates for each 1 distinct arrangement.
Total arrangements of KELLLY with repetions=npr=6factorial
6 factrial consists of each unique arrangements upto total n unqiue sets{x1,x2...Xn}+5 duplicates of every each unique arrangements 5{x1,x2...Xn}={x1,x2...Xn}+5{x1,x2...Xn}
=>{x1,x2...Xn}+5{x1,x2...Xn}=6 factorial
=>6{x1,x2...Xn}=6 factorial
=>x1...Xn=6 factorail/6 =120 arrangements
n=120 n denotes total no of disitnct permutations
Is my method of explaining this thing to myself is right?
CASE 2:If i try the same method with this word
REERR = R1E1E2R2R3
1:R2E1E2R1R3 2:R2E1E2R3R1 3:R3E1E2R1R2 4:R3E1E2R2R1 5:R1E1E2R3R2
only changing r position will give me extra 5.
Now changing E postion will give me one extra R1E2E1R2R3 of the (form REERR)
Total duplicates or extra =6 for each unqiue arrangement of the word REERR
FOR arrangmnt of REERR there are 6 extra .... and of EERRR 6 extra and so on...
Total arrangements of REERR with repetions=npr=5factorial
5 factrial consists of each unique arrangements {x1,x2...Xn}+6 duplicates of every each unique arrangements 6{x1,x2...Xn}={x1,x2...Xn}+6{x1,x2...Xn}
=>{x1,x2...Xn}+6{x1,x2...Xn}=5 factorial
=>7{x1,x2...Xn}=5 factorial
=>x1...Xn=5 factorail/7
WHy wrong? Why the previous method does not work in case2
@Dr.Peterson @Subhotosh Khan