You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Ankit006
- Start date

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 14,291

I would say that the first integral is written incorrectly, as the order of dydx implies that the inner integral is with respect to y, which would make no sense. But possibly your book uses a different convention.This is one of the double integral math examples in my textbook. I don't understand this step. How we can move dy like this. isn't integral 0 to 1 for dx. (Sorry for my bad english)

View attachment 33595

Can you show us the context? What is said before this may be important for clarification.

Can you show us the context? What is said before this may be important for clarification.

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 14,291

This problem is from a math pdf file my college give me. This problem is from the multivariable calculus chapter and the section is double and triple integral.

Last edited:

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 14,291

This just shows that they are introducing the idea of dA = dxdy = dydx, but not how the order relates to the limits of integration. Presumably that is shown somewhere between the two things you've shown.This problem is from a math pdf file my college give me. This problem is from the multivariable calculus chapter and the section is double and triple integral.

Ultimately, though, I think they just made a mistake in the problem you asked about. This isn't some advanced, specialized notation.