It seems to me like the presence of so many variables is what's confusing you. Let's dispense with as many of them as we can. What if we replace
k by 2,
w by 3, and
v by 4. Then you'd have:
2a=43
How would you solve this equation for
a? Well, you'd divide both sides of the equation by 2, so as to isolate
a on one side:
a=43÷2
Now, can we clean that up a bit? Dividing by 2 is the same as multiplying by
21 (why?):
a=43×21=4×23×1=83
Let's do it again, still replacing
w by 3, and
v by 4, but this time replacing
k by 7:
7a=43
How would you solve this equation for
a? Well, you'd divide both sides of the equation by 7 (i.e. multiply by
71), so as to isolate
a on one side:
a=43×71=4×73×1=283
That seems like it should be sufficient to get the core concept down, so now let's re-introduce our variables, one at a time. First, re-introduce
v:
a=v3×71=v×73×1=7v3
Next, re-introduce
w:
a=vw×71=v×7w×1=7vw
And finally, re-introduce
k:
a=vw×k1=v×kw×1=kvw
In each of the two cases with "real" values, you simply divided by the value of
k which undid the multiplication. Any reason to believe the exact same process wouldn't apply here? You may not know the exact value of
k, but you can still work with it all the same.