Hey, maybe someone can help me with my task:
Assume two periods, today and the future, and an interest rate i = 10% for discounting the future period. Imagine a private firm operating within the power sector and consider an investment project over the two periods with the following monetary outcomes in million €:
Construction costs today 70
Social (environmental) damages via air pollution in the future 33
Firm’s revenue in the future 110
Free knowledge creation for society today 50
Wage payments today 20
Wage payments in the future 22
A. Assume that there are no policies in place. Would the private profit‐maximizing management of this firm implement this project today and for what reason? Which concept(s) do you use to answer this question? Please write out the calculation and the values that you include and the result in million €. Briefly explain your solution procedure and interpret the outcome.
B. Would you as a public policy maker with a social (and environmental) objective like to get the project being implemented today and for what reason? Write out the calculation with the values that you include and the result in million €. Briefly explain your solution procedure and interpret the outcome.
My answers:
A:
Concept: Cost-benefit Analysis with Net present value (NPV). I would compare my NPV for if the firm implements the project now, with if the firm implements it in the future.
Profit-maximization
For implementation Now I would include the "Construction costs today" and the "Wage payment today" as costs for today, the benefits would be the "Firm’s revenue in the future".
For implementation Future I would include the "Construction costs today" and the "Wage payments in the future", the benefits would still be "Firm’s revenue in the future".
Now:
Costs = Construction costs today + Wage payment today = 70 + 20
Benefits = Firm’s revenue in the future = 110
Difference = 20
NPV = 20/1,1 = 18,18
Future:
Costs = Construction costs today + Wage payment in the future = 70 + 22
Benefits = Firm’s revenue in the future = 110
Difference = 18
NPV = 18/1,1 = 16,36
Because NPV Now is bigger as NPV Future, i would recomend the implementation of the project Now.
B: For B i would include "Social (environmental) damages via air pollution in the future" as additional "costs" for both Now and Future. And "Free knowledge creation for society today" as additional "benefits" only in Now.
Sorry, my mothertongue isn't english. I hope someone can help me, because I'm really not sure about my calculations.
Have a nice day
Jonathan
Assume two periods, today and the future, and an interest rate i = 10% for discounting the future period. Imagine a private firm operating within the power sector and consider an investment project over the two periods with the following monetary outcomes in million €:
Construction costs today 70
Social (environmental) damages via air pollution in the future 33
Firm’s revenue in the future 110
Free knowledge creation for society today 50
Wage payments today 20
Wage payments in the future 22
A. Assume that there are no policies in place. Would the private profit‐maximizing management of this firm implement this project today and for what reason? Which concept(s) do you use to answer this question? Please write out the calculation and the values that you include and the result in million €. Briefly explain your solution procedure and interpret the outcome.
B. Would you as a public policy maker with a social (and environmental) objective like to get the project being implemented today and for what reason? Write out the calculation with the values that you include and the result in million €. Briefly explain your solution procedure and interpret the outcome.
My answers:
A:
Concept: Cost-benefit Analysis with Net present value (NPV). I would compare my NPV for if the firm implements the project now, with if the firm implements it in the future.
Profit-maximization
For implementation Now I would include the "Construction costs today" and the "Wage payment today" as costs for today, the benefits would be the "Firm’s revenue in the future".
For implementation Future I would include the "Construction costs today" and the "Wage payments in the future", the benefits would still be "Firm’s revenue in the future".
Now:
Costs = Construction costs today + Wage payment today = 70 + 20
Benefits = Firm’s revenue in the future = 110
Difference = 20
NPV = 20/1,1 = 18,18
Future:
Costs = Construction costs today + Wage payment in the future = 70 + 22
Benefits = Firm’s revenue in the future = 110
Difference = 18
NPV = 18/1,1 = 16,36
Because NPV Now is bigger as NPV Future, i would recomend the implementation of the project Now.
B: For B i would include "Social (environmental) damages via air pollution in the future" as additional "costs" for both Now and Future. And "Free knowledge creation for society today" as additional "benefits" only in Now.
Sorry, my mothertongue isn't english. I hope someone can help me, because I'm really not sure about my calculations.
Have a nice day
Jonathan