Sorry to question a post by the infamous @skeeter, I think that it is better to say to equate the ratios of the hypotenuse to the vertical legs of the similar triangles. The reason is that if the two legs of each triangle were close in size then it might confuse the student. On the other hand, the triangles could have been orientated so that there were no horizontal and vertical legs.equate the ratios of hypotenuse to short leg of two similar triangles
Sorry to question a post by the infamous @skeeter, ...
First state the "unstated" assumption - the flagpole is perpendicular to the ground.
Sometimes I think that if one dissects any word problem it will have a problem... but I get your point.First state the "unstated" assumption - the flagpole is perpendicular to the ground.
I learned that from you......if one dissects any word problem it will have a problem...
Wrong (again) Steven! The flag pole is zero metres from the ground, it's the top of the flag pole that is 12 m from the ground. ??The answer is that the flag pole is 12m from the ground. How do I know this? It was given in the problem.
NOT true! The flag pole occupies space from 0m to 12m from the ground!?Wrong (again) Steven! The flag pole is zero metres from the ground, it's the top of the flag pole that is 12 m from the ground. ??
(Another wee trip to the corner for you, eh? )