Set Theory

ofir

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Messages
4
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)

Thank you.
 
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)

Thank you.
since you did not show any work/thought about the problem, let us make sure we have understanding of common definitions.

Please tell us - What is the definition of disjointed set/s?

Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.

Please follow the rules of posting in this forum, as enunciated at:


Please share your work/thoughts about this problem.
 
The definiation of disjointed sets are if x is a set and y is a set, they are disjointed, there intersection are empty.
I tried to do to define A (inifity set) as { ∅,{∅},{∅,{∅}}…}, and B is {∅}, but I don't know if it is ok? And if it is not, which example can be suitable?
 
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)
Does the notation P(A)\bf{P}(A) stand for the powerset of A ?A~?
 
Yes. P(A) is the powerset of A.
I am trying to find an example that disprove this statement.
 
P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
I am looking for an example to disprove it.
I found that:
A = { n | n * n=1, n ∈ Z}
B = {1}

Is it correct? If not, can you please give me an example of sets A and B that disprove the statement.

Thank you.
 
P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
That statement is true.
|f AB=A\cap B=\emptyset then AB=AA\setminus B = A therefore P(AB)=P(A)\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A).
We prove the converse by contradiction.
Suppose that P(AB)=P(A) & tAB\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A)~\&~\exists t\in A\cap B.
But that means {t}P(A)\{t\}\in \mathscr{P}(A) but {t}P(AB)\{t\}\notin \mathscr{P}(A\setminus B).
Thus if P(AB)=P(A)\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A) then AB=A\cap B=\emptyset
 
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)
The above is a logically true statement.
That takes a bit of explaining.
The statement If 2+2=52+2=5 then (1)2<0(-1)^2<0 is true. Because a false implies any statement.
The statement (AB)A=(BA)A(A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A is false.
 
@pka
(AUB)\A = B\A
(B\A)UA = BUA
Now (B\A) = BUA if A = \emptysetBut pka claims (I think) that (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA is never true.
 
@pka
(AUB)\A = B\A
(B\A)UA = BUA
Now (B\A) = BUA if A = \emptysetBut pka claims (I think) that (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA is never true.
Note that the problem states BB\ne \emptyset and if (AB)A=(BA)A(A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A then BAB\subset A
 
Note that the problem states BB\ne \emptyset and if (AB)A=(BA)A(A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A then BAB\subset A
But I never assumed that B = \emptyset
 
But I never assumed that B = \emptyset
I understand that you did not but the problem does.
It says that if (AB)A=(BA)A(A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A then BAB\subset A {B not empty.) If A is empty then B is also.
Think about it.
(AB)A(AB)Ac(AAc)(BAc)BA(A\cup B)\setminus A\\ (A\cup B)\cap A^c\\(A\cap A^c)\cup (B\cap A^c)\\B\setminus A AND (BA)A(BAc)A(BA)(AcA)BA(B\setminus A)\cup A\\(B\cap A^c)\cup A\\(B\cup A)\cap (A^c\cup A)\\B\cup A It is saying that BA=BAB\setminus A=B\cup A implies BAB\subset A BB\ne \emptyset
 
I too arrived in my previous post that that the problem is saying that B∖A=B∪A implies B⊂A (and B≠∅).

Now I see it, if A = ∅ and B A, the B= ∅
 
Top