solve (2^2x)-3 * (2^x+1) + 8 = 0, (3^2x+1) - 10 * (3^x) + 3

jackayyy

New member
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
3
I am in desperate need of help on my advanced math project. I need to solve these two problems, but I can't figure them out.

1) (2^2x)-3 * (2^x+1) + 8 = 0

2) (3^2x+1) - 10 * (3^x) + 3 = 0

Thanks so much! :]
 
jackayyy said:
1) (2^2x)-3 * (2^x+1) + 8 = 0

2) (3^2x+1) - 10 * (3^x) + 3 = 0
Your formatting is ambiguous.

1) Do you mean any of the following?

. . . . .[(2<sup>2</sup>x) - 3][2<sup>x</sup> + 1] + 8 = 0

. . . . .2<sup>2</sup>x - 3[2<sup>x</sup> + 1] + 8 = 0

. . . . .2<sup>2</sup>x - 3(2<sup>x + 1</sup>) + 8 = 0

. . . . .2<sup>2x</sup> - 3(2<sup>x + 1</sup>) + 8 = 0

Or did you mean something else?

2) Same question.

When you reply, please show everything you have tried so far. Thank you.

Eliz.
 
they are listed like this in my book;

1. 2<sup>2x</sup> - 3 * 2<sup>x + 1</sup> + 8 = 0
2. 3<sup>2x+1</sup> - 10 * 3<sup>x</sup> + 3 = 0

the book doesnt give any grouping symbols, so i don't know where to start, or how to really read the problem. where i put the asterik that means the book just gives a multiplication dot. theres no parenthesis to indicate wheather or not the - 3(first problem) belongs with 2<sup>2x</sup> or 2<sup>x + 1</sup>. same with the second problem i don't know weather the - 10 belongs with 3<sup>2x+1</sup> or 3<sup>x</sup> . sorry if that doesn't make sense.


well i have been working on the 2nd problem first because my book lists the answer as 1 or -1. and i figured if i could figure out how to solve the problem i could apply those concepts to the first problem.

work


(3<sup>2x+1</sup> - 10) * (3<sup>x</sup> + 3 )= 0
i grouped those together and then tried the foil method to get this

9 <sup>3x+1</sup> - 30<sup>x</sup> + 9<sup>2x+1</sup> - 30 = 0

then i tried factoring by grouping to get this

9<sup>2x+1</sup>(1<sup>x</sup>) - 30(1<sup>x</sup>)=0
9<sup>4x</sup> - 30<sup>x</sup>= 0

after i did this i then tried to substitute the answers in to see if i was on the right track, and then answers didn't work, so this approach was totally wrong.

i tried then to multiply the -10 by the 3<sup>x</sup>

to get 3<sup>2x+1</sup>-30<sup>x</sup> + 3 = 0

substituting the answer into that works, but i have no idea where to go from there.
i hope that helps :]
 
jackayyy said:
they are listed like this in my book;

1. 2<sup>2x</sup> - 3 * 2<sup>x + 1</sup> + 8 = 0
2. 3<sup>2x+1</sup> - 10 * 3<sup>x</sup> + 3 = 0
In what follows, I will start with my guess as to the book's meaning.

1) 2<sup>2x</sup> - 3(2<sup>x + 1</sup>) + 8 = 0

Since 2<sup>x + 1</sup> = (2<sup>x</sup>)(2<sup>1</sup>) = 2(2<sup>x</sup>), this equation simplifies to be a quadratic in 2<sup>x</sup>:

. . . . .[2<sup>x</sup>]<sup>2</sup> - 6[2<sup>x</sup>] + 8 = 0

Factor, or apply the Quadratic Formula (with a = 1, b = -6, c = 8), to find the values of 2<sup>x</sup>. Then solve the resulting exponential equations.

2) 3<sup>2x + 1</sup> - 10(3<sup>x</sup>) + 3 = 0

Since 3<sup>2x + 1</sup> = (3<sup>2x</sup>)(3<sup>1</sup>) = 3(3<sup>2x</sup>), this is just another quadratic, this time in 3<sup>x</sup>:

. . . . .3[3<sup>x</sup>]<sup>2</sup> - 10[3<sup>x</sup>] + 3 = 0

Factor, or apply the Quadratic Formula (with a = 3, b = -10, c = 3), to find the values of 3<sup>x</sup>. Then solve the resulting exponential equations.

Eliz.
 
oh wow. how did i not see that lol. i was thinking okay maybe i need to use logs? but seriosuly thank you so much. you just saved my math grade :]
 
Top