Thanks. That makes since for the second example, but I am still stuck on the first one 2(7^x)=3126? If the 2 wasn't there it would be simple, but that 2 is throwing me off?
I've tried to work it every way I can think of, but I can seem to get an answer that checks out?
Can I get any help on that one?
I've also tried (log(3126)\log(7))\log2 but that gave me 13.738
I've tried dividing the log of each separately by 2 then subtracting them also? I am just completely lost on this one?
Do you know how to use the Change-of-Base Formula? Scientific calculators do not have a button for base-7 logarithms, so you need to use the formula to convert the log_7 to either log_10 or log_e.
I'm hoping that you wrote this through comprehension of the Change-of-Base Formula, and not simply changing the 3.5 to 7 (from what I wrote above). My point: Make sure that you understand how to apply the formula, and remember it.
'
jimmypop said:
… Wasn't doing the order of operations right I guess? …
I'm not sure about your thoughts because it seems like that 2 was flying all over the place. When solving an equation for a variable that appears in the exponent position, we need to first isolate the power containing it. Solving the following, for example, will require the same strategy: first isolate 7^x; then apply logarithms.
Thanks, My father passed away a few weeks ago and I had to miss a couple classes. Obviously it was the classes that dealt with logs. Tomorrow morning is a test and This text book explains a few things, but no where near the examples I am looking at? It's driving me crazy. I've gotten all A's in this class, now I'm afraid that this test is going to bring down my average considerably..
Anyways, I don;t mean to ramble, but thanks again.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.