staircase sequence

Teresa

New member
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
11
Hi, I need help with coming up with an equation for the number of squares in each sequence. I have attached a copy of the question and I found out how to calculate the height in each figure by taking the figure number and then adding 1 which will give the height for any sequence. I am not sure how to calculate the number of squares, I have counted the total number of squares for each figure by counting diagonally from the top of the staircase but I am not sure how to come up with an equation?
 

Attachments

  • staircaseproblem.png
    staircaseproblem.png
    45.7 KB · Views: 6
  • staircasequestion.jpg
    staircasequestion.jpg
    250.3 KB · Views: 8
Hi, I need help with coming up with an equation for the number of squares in each sequence. I have attached a copy of the question and I found out how to calculate the height in each figure by taking the figure number and then adding 1 which will give the height for any sequence. I am not sure how to calculate the number of squares, I have counted the total number of squares for each figure by counting diagonally from the top of the staircase but I am not sure how to come up with an equation?
I agree with all of your work.
You might note that \(1+2+3+\cdots+n-1+n=\dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}\)
 
Let k = 1+2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 + 9 + 10 and then write it backwards

k = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10
k= 10 +9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1
How would you add the right hand side? After adding it what would k equal?

Now we do the same thing with:
S = 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n
S = n+(n-1)+(n-2) + ... + 1

Now what does S equal?
 
Another way to see the same idea is to make a second copy of the figure and put it upside-down on top of the first copy, to make a rectangle. It's easy to find the size of the rectangle ...
 
Do you mean to make a second copy of figure # 1 and put that figure on top of the original figure 1, that would then give me a total of 6 squares?
 
Do you mean to make a second copy of figure # 1 and put that figure on top of the original figure 1, that would then give me a total of 6 squares?
Yes, that is what Dr Peterson meant. Now how do you use that information to find out the number of squares in fig 1? Remember that whatever you say must also work for the other figures as well.
 
Top