… Can someone work it out for me?
Hi fg9. There are different ways to express both X
1 and X
2 in terms of P
1 and P
2. Your subject line implies that you tried the substitution method. Can you show your attempt (up to the point where you got stuck)?
If you weren't able to start, then here's one way to carry out the substitutions. Solve the following for X
2 (let's call it equation #1):
\[X_1 = \frac{m - P_2 \cdot X_2}{P_1} \quad (1)\]
Your result will take this form (let's call it equation #3):
\[X_2 = \text{expression containing X}_1 \quad (3) \]
We'll use equation #3, at the end. Next, solve the following for X
2 (let's call it equation #2):
\[\frac{X_2 + 3}{X_1 + 2} = \frac{P_1}{P_2} \quad (2)\]
You've now solved both equations #1 and #2 for X
2. Set those results equal to one another, and solve that equation for X
1. The solution will match the final expression given for X
1.
The last steps are to substitute the final expression for X
1 into equation #3 and to solve that for X
2. The solution will match the final expression given for X
2.
Again, these steps are just one of several ways to express X
1 and X
2 each in terms of P
1 and P
2. If you tried something else, and you want to go that route, then please show us your steps. Otherwise, try the approach above, and let us know if you have any questions.
?