This comes from a book called ' Mathematics and the Imagination' by Kasner and Newman.

### Mathematics and the Imagination - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It is quite a claim. Do others agree?

- Thread starter apple2357
- Start date

This comes from a book called ' Mathematics and the Imagination' by Kasner and Newman.

en.wikipedia.org

It is quite a claim. Do others agree?

- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021

- Messages
- 3

A function is a "black box" which accepts an input at one end and supplies an output at the other end, and is defined by the relationship between the output and the input. Or in other words, the function performs operations on the input to "transform" it into the output. So a function is essentially a set of mathematical operations to be performed in a certain order.

Take for example the simplest possible function \( f(x) = 1 \). This describes an operation where we input any number \( x \), and receive the constant \( 1 \) as an output. The mathematical operation performed by this function is to multiply \( x \) by its reciprocal \( x^{-1} \).

Anyway I'm just kinda rambling here, but in general I agree. Mathematics as we know it would not exist without the concept of functions.

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 11,537

I think there are a lot of other candidates. "Number" could be one ... and "proof" might be another."the word ‘function’ probably expressesthe most important idea in the whole history of mathematics,…”

This comes from a book called ' Mathematics and the Imagination' by Kasner and Newman.

## Mathematics and the Imagination - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It is quite a claim. Do others agree?

And, of course, the explicit concept of function came after a lot of history had already passed.

But "function" is fundamental at least to calculus as we know it (because without it, you can't even talk about what differentiation acts on and produces). And a lot of other mathematics followed. So I'm not sure about "the whole history of", but I can agree with "modern".

- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012

- Messages
- 7,544

I would argue for "set".

Please say more!I would argue for "set".

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 10,568

Be careful there! The way you defined f(x) =1 as f(x) =x*xTake for example the simplest possible function \( f(x) = 1 \). This describes an operation where we input any number \( x \), and receive the constant \( 1 \) as an output. The mathematical operation performed by this function is to multiply \( x \) by its reciprocal \( x^{-1} \).

- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012

- Messages
- 7,544

One can argue that the "set" concept precedes that of "number" as illustrated by Peano's axioms,Please say more!

"The whole numbers consist of a set of objects, N, called "numbers", together with a "Successor function", S, from N to N, satisfying these axioms.

1. There exist a unique member of N, called "0", that is NOT the image, under S, of any other number in N.

2. If a subset, M, of N contains 0 and, for any n in M, S(n) is also in M them M= N. (induction axiom)."

This suggests that set and function are of equal logical importance.One can argue that the "set" concept precedes that of "number" as illustrated by Peano's axioms,

"The whole numbers consist of a set of objects, N, called "numbers", together with a "Successor function", S, from N to N, satisfying these axioms.

1. There exist a unique member of N, called "0", that is NOT the image, under S, of any other number in N.

2. If a subset, M, of N contains 0 and, for any n in M, S(n) is also in M them M= N. (induction axiom)."

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 11,537

Of course, functions are defined (a)This suggests that set and function are of equal logical importance.

Of course, the original question was about "the most important idea in the whole history of mathematics", which doesn't necessarily mean most fundamental. If we're looking for the idea that produced the most wide-ranging effect, one candidate would be

I obviously agree that functions are defined on sets and represent sets, but, in the context of what I wrote, namely the Peano postulates, you can go nowhere without the succesor function.Of course, functions are defined (a)on sets(domain and range) and (b)as sets(of ordered pairs). So sets logically come before functions.

Of course, the original question was about "the most important idea in the whole history of mathematics", which doesn't necessarily mean most fundamental. If we're looking for the idea that produced the most wide-ranging effect, one candidate would besymbolic notation! It didn't take long from the invention of x and y to the invention of calculus, and I think there may be a direct connection. Then, as I see it, the idea of function became necessary to explain what in the world calculus was about (deriving new functions from old), and that led to further new ideas.

I agree as well with the importance of literal symbolism: the amount of math developed in the century after Viete read Diophantus exceeded everything done in the preceding millenium.

However, I was speaking a bit tongue in cheek. I also agree with you that logically prior does not mean more important in any general sense. To me, the most important idea in mathematics is quantity.

- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014

- Messages
- 405

Another candidate (a necessary development for symbolic notation to have taken place) would be the positional system of numeration; one might say it's the collective unconscious' expression of an elusive intuitive concept expressed explicitly.... If we're looking for the idea that produced the most wide-ranging effect, one candidate would besymbolic notation! It didn't take long from the invention of x and y to the invention of calculus, and I think there may be a direct connection. Then, as I see it, the idea of function became necessary to explain what in the world calculus was about (deriving new functions from old), and that led to further new ideas.