- Thread starter Squish
- Start date

- Joined
- Apr 12, 2005

- Messages
- 9,926

Also, you may wish to divide by 5, just to make your life a little easier. Up to you. Sometimes, it's convenient not to simplify as you go along.

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 3,634

Yes, I am positively sure that is how it is written.

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 3,526

Now you can divide by 2.it'll be:

2sin(x) - 2sin(x)cos(x) = 4/pi

But I can't solve that either.

Alright, so the equation would then beNow you can divide by 2.

sin(x) - sin(x)cos(x)=2/pi

but still there's not much to do here; as taking sin(x) as a common factor and then trying to divide it out of the equation won't work as the 2/pi would still hold it.

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 3,634

So here's a new question: In your context, is it possible that you are expected to find approximate solutions using technology, rather than exact solutions by algebraic means? What else would I learn if I grabbed your book from you and looked through the context? Are any special methods needed for other problems nearby?

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 1,380

Maybe the book has a typo.… I am positively sure that [I have posted it] how it is written.

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 1,380

That was my thought, also. There are two solutions, and (according to MVR5) the exact form of the larger solution looks like this:… doesn't seem very workable …is it possible that you are expected to find approximate solutions using technology, rather than exact solutions …

arctan(1/6

- Joined
- Nov 24, 2012

- Messages
- 1,587

- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017

- Messages
- 3,634