Nope...
You've got the number part right, though. It seems that you've applied 2/3 multiplier to the a and b's exponents. If the example looks like Euler wrote then it is not needed: 2/3 is simply another fraction that has to be multiplied by whatever left from the first one and you already did that- that's where 18 came from, right?
Compare:
(x^2/y^3)(5/6) = 5x^2/6y^3;
and
(x^2/y^3)^(5/6) = x^(5/3)/y^(5/2) - in this case 5/6 is not simply a fraction but an exponent that has to be applied to every part of the expression in the parentheses.