my question, if there's a parent with one children and its color is yellow, is the parent called ZOMBIE? if so why?!

I know if the parent doesn't have children then he's ZOMBIE, but what if he has just one child yellow?(not both)

- Thread starter Ryan$
- Start date

my question, if there's a parent with one children and its color is yellow, is the parent called ZOMBIE? if so why?!

I know if the parent doesn't have children then he's ZOMBIE, but what if he has just one child yellow?(not both)

- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012

- Messages
- 6,753

but lemme ask you before that, The statement is "IF you are the parent of two "yellow" children THEN you are a ZOMBIE". that says nothing about what happens if just one of its children yellow? I mean can I conclude from "IF you are the parent of two "yellow" children THEN you are a ZOMBIE" that his children must be "Yellow" ?The statement is "IF you are the parent of two "yellow" children THEN you are a ZOMBIE". That saysNOTHINGabout what happens if you are NOT "the parent of two yellow children".

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 2,562

If a person has no children, they are not a parent.... if the parent doesn't have children then ...

- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012

- Messages
- 6,753

That

Now you have another question: 'can I conclude from "IF you are the parent of two "yellow" children THEN you are a ZOMBIE" that his children must be "Yellow"'. Certainly if the hypothesis, "IF you are the parent of two "yellow" children" is true then his children must be "yellow"! That's obvious!

lets assume I arrived to x=y, then I complete my analysis and did some calculations, I arrived to y=z ;

my question in the book given that x=z, why?

I arrived to x=y

y=z, so why x=z?!!!! can someone explain it to me be senseable analogy to our real life to elaborate why if x=y, y=z then x=z ?!

thanks alot

- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007

- Messages
- 22,491

Please define x, y & z.

lets assume I arrived to x=y, then I complete my analysis and did some calculations, I arrived to y=z ;

my question in the book given that x=z, why?

I arrived to x=y

y=z, so why x=z?!!!! can someone explain it to me be senseable analogy to our real life to elaborate why if x=y, y=z then x=z ?!

thanks alot

Please also define "=" according to your text book or your understanding.

- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012

- Messages
- 959

You have three pots, all with 3 eggs in them. Lable them x, y, z.

lets assume I arrived to x=y, then I complete my analysis and did some calculations, I arrived to y=z ;

my question in the book given that x=z, why?

I arrived to x=y

y=z, so why x=z?!!!! can someone explain it to me be senseable analogy to our real life to elaborate why if x=y, y=z then x=z ?!

thanks alot

The first pot has 3 eggs in it and the second has 3 eggs, so we can write x = y.

The second pot has 3 eggs and the third has three egss, so we can write y = z.

So we know that x = z. Three eggs in x and three eggs in z.

Unless you want to get into axiomatic set theory, that's about as deep as it goes.

-Dan

what's struggling me is: yeah x=y right? but who will ensure for me that if I progress in my analysis and arrived to y=z, that's x=y still right? if so then we can say x=z ! but if I didn't change the equation x=y who ensure for me that it's really didn't change that equation and still right for any circumstances ?!

what's confusing me this:

(1) x=y ..so fine with that.

after 5minutes of thinking and analysing problem, I get

(2) y=z

then we conclude that x=z, but what's confusing me why it's that right? who ensures that the first equation is still right and none changed it?! that's what confusing me alot!!!

Remember that variables stand for numbers.

\(\displaystyle 10 + 7 = 20 - 3.\)

\(\displaystyle 33 - 16 = 20 - 3\)

So is it true or false that

\(\displaystyle 10 + 7 = 33 - 16.\)

The statement

\(\displaystyle x = y \text { and } z = y \implies x = z\)

is merely a generalization of that example.

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 2,562

Is that book written in English? (Maybe that's part of your issue.)... my question in the book given that x=z, why?

If you and I have exactly $1 in our pocket, and somebody else says to

what's confusing me, why if x=y then we can assign instead of x, y or actually instead of y x ..why is that correct?! may please anyone explain to me what "=" means by an analogy to be more sensitive to me?!

we mean that x and y represent the same thing. They are just different names for the same thing. If you own only one dog and it is named Toto, it makes no difference whether you say "my dog" or "Toto" because both refer to the same animal.

By "same thing" in math, we frequently mean "have the same numerical value."

So I can say \(\displaystyle 13 + 3 = 21 - 5\)

because both expressions evaluate to the same result, namely 16.

You seem to be taking something that is easy and making it hard. In the case of 13 + 3 and 21 - 5, the expressions themselves are different, but the value of the expressions is identical. We look beyond the superficial form of the expressions and consider the quantitative meaning represented by the expressions.

So yes we can replace 13 + 3 by 21 - 5 or replace 21 - 5 by 13 + 3 because both expressions are quantitatively identical.

I got you !

we mean that x and y represent the same thing. They are just different names for the same thing. If you own only one dog and it is named Toto, it makes no difference whether you say "my dog" or "Toto" because both refer to the same animal.

By "same thing" in math, we frequently mean "have the same numerical value."

So I can say \(\displaystyle 13 + 3 = 21 - 5\)

because both expressions evaluate to the same result, namely 16.

You seem to be taking something that is easy and making it hard. In the case of 13 + 3 and 21 - 5, the expressions themselves are different, but the value of the expressions is identical. We look beyond the superficial form of the expressions and consider the quantitative meaning represented by the expressions.

So yes we can replace 13 + 3 by 21 - 5 or replace 21 - 5 by 13 + 3 because both expressions are quantitatively identical.

but lemme ask something else, if I assign "my dog"=z , then we can call "my dog" as z?! what's confusing me, we must define "my dog" =: z and not "my dog" = z ! there's difference between "=" and "=:"(definition in math) .. but it seems the same ? I mean the mean of "=" is the same as "=:" ?!

well what's confusing me is how can I do x=y and then say that's y is the same as x, but I didn't before define what's y !Are you talking about equality vs assignment?